Classifieds
Obituaries
Eureka Reporter Logo
 

Arcata Youth Protection Act moves forward

By CERENA JOHNSON, The Eureka Reporter
Published: Apr 29 2008, 10:53 PM · Updated: Apr 30 2008, 12:00 PM
Category: Local News
Over 2,100 signatures were gathered by the North Coast United to Protect Youth group to move forward in getting a measure on the November ballot that would ban military recruitment of minors in Arcata. Tyson Ritter/The Eureka Reporter

Supporters of the “Arcata Youth Protection Act” gathered at Arcata City Hall Tuesday to submit signatures, signifying the next step in the process of getting an initiative placed on the November ballot.

The proposed ordinance, introduced by North Coast United to Protect Youth, aims to prohibit military recruitment of youth under age 18 within the city of Arcata.

Over the past eight weeks, more than 2,100 signatures were collected, said Dave Meserve of North Coast United to Protect Youth.

The city clerk now has 30 days to verify voter signatures before the proposed initiative heads to the Arcata City Council, which will decide whether to adopt the ordinance before continuing the process through the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors.

“We’re happy to have reached this stage,” Meserve said.

The proposed initiative has gained the attention of some in the local political arena, including Assemblymember Patty Berg, who recently endorsed it.

Speaking as a resident and not as a school board member, Shane Brinton spoke of inequalities in the amount of resources available for job recruiters versus military recruiters.

Brinton said he is “very supportive of our armed forces,” but questioned tactics.

“The goal here is to protect our young people,” he said.

Supporters said they backed the initiative for a number of reasons.

Arcata resident Cathi Bettinger said her 17-year-old son intends to join the Marines — something she is not in support of.

“I think it’s time we just say no,” she said.

Others said that youth under the age of 18 should not be targeted as they are not considered to be mature enough by society to engage in some legal or civic activities.

“I don’t feel the military should initiate recruiting of those under 18,” said Arcata resident Dennis Shaughnessy, adding, “People can’t vote until they are 18.”

Some said youth should not be exposed to the realities of war.

“We rate our movies and even our TV shows,” said Sara Sunstein, who works with people who suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. “The military is an “R” organization,” she said.

Supporters of the initiative also said they have commonly heard the complaint that recruiters “lied,” and are just doing what is required to meet quotas.

Officials from the local Air Force and Navy recruitment offices were contacted but unavailable for comment Tuesday.

Cathy Pauley, public affairs specialist for the Sacramento U.S. Army Recruiting Battalion, told The Eureka Reporter Monday that while recruiters talk to juniors and seniors in high school, they do not recruit minors.

The military depends on the ability to be able to speak with students, she said.

Comments8 comments   Back to topBack to top

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors. To post comments, please register an account (or log in if you already have one). You must enter your name and contact information in the “Personal Information” section and check the “Request comment permission” box.

Anonymous — , (other) — Apr 30 2008, 10:31 AM

If enacted, stop funds for Arcata.

Notify administrators of inappropriate comment

Anonymous — , (other) — Apr 30 2008, 10:33 AM

Why is the picture above not showing any children but old, dirty hippies? The 60's are over and you lost hippies, GROW UP.

Notify administrators of inappropriate comment

Anonymous — , (other) — Apr 30 2008, 11:39 AM

Why does the city of Arcata,County of Humboldt, and their employees (our policymakers) continue to waste time and taxpayer dollars on an intiative that will ultimately prove unconstitutional? Way to go Arcata...

Notify administrators of inappropriate comment

Anonymous — , (other) — Apr 30 2008, 11:55 AM

Hmmm. Ever consider that perhaps the children were in school? And one very active teenager has tried several times to have her voice heard by this paper but they refuse to print her letters.

And some of those so-called hippies are teachers, contractors, artists, parents, county employees, school board members, and such. Maybe get your "facts" straight before you start making assumptions. And did you ever consider that perhaps the photographer chose who to show?

And some of the people who were there weren't even alive in the 60s. Once again, assumptions...

Notify administrators of inappropriate comment

Anonymous — , (other) — Apr 30 2008, 12:21 PM

Like Berkley, once the funds have stopped going to Arcata they will back down.

I hope the do approve this act so that Arcata gets what is coming to them. Doesn't Arcata have more pressing issues to deal with?

Notify administrators of inappropriate comment

Anonymous — , (other) — Apr 30 2008, 2:24 PM

Like POTHOLES IN THE ROAD?

Notify administrators of inappropriate comment

Anonymous — , (other) — May 1 2008, 12:31 AM

Been to Arcata lately? Potholes are being filled, when there's enough money to do so. No matter how you feel about it, this resolution isn't going to stop that from happening. So what's your point?

Notify administrators of inappropriate comment

Anonymous — , (other) — May 1 2008, 3:22 PM

Of course the potholes are being filled, with all that money coming in by selling dope in the plaza, Arcata is going to flurish. Military bad, drugs good, yeah, the priorities are right here!

Notify administrators of inappropriate comment